Skip to main content

Why can't you divide by zero?

In the world of math, many strange results are possible when we change the rules. But there’s one rule that most of us have been warned not to break: don’t divide by zero. How can the simple combination of an everyday number and a basic operation cause such problem?                                     

Hands holding the number 0245990083

Normally, dividing by smaller and smaller numbers gives you bigger and bigger answers. Ten divided by two is five, by one is ten, by one-millionth is 10 million, and so on. So it seems like if you divide by numbers that keep shrinking all the way down to zero, the answer will grow to the largest thing possible. Then, isn’t the answer to 10 divided by zero actually infinity? That may sound plausible. But all we really know is that if we divide 10 by a number that tends towards zero, the answer tends towards infinity. And that’s not the same thing assaying that 10 divided by zero is equal to infinity. Why not? Well, let’s take a closer look at what division really means. Ten divided by two could mean, "How many times must we add two together to make 10,” or, “two times what equals 10?” Dividing by a number is essentially the reverse of multiplying by it, in the following way: if we multiply any number by a given number x, we can ask if there’s a new number we can multiply by afterwards to get back to where we started. If there is, the new number is called the multiplicative inverse of x. For example, if you multiply three by two to get six, you can then multiply by one-half to get back to three. 

So the multiplicative inverse of two is one-half, and the multiplicative inverse of 10 is one-tenth. As you might notice, the product of any number and its multiplicative inverse is always one. If we want to divide by zero, we need to find its multiplicative inverse, which should be one over zero. This would have to be such a number that multiplying it by zero would give one. But because anything multiplied by zero is still zero, such a number is impossible, so zero has no multiplicative inverse. Does that really settle things, though? 

After all, mathematicians have broken rules before. For example, for a long time, there was no such thing as taking the square root of negative numbers. But then mathematicians defined the square root of negative one as a new number called I, opening up a whole new mathematical world of complex numbers. So if they can do that, couldn’t we just make up a new rule, say, that the symbol infinity means one over zero, and see what happens? Let's try it, imagining we don’t know anything about infinity already. Based on the definition of a multiplicative inverse, zero times infinity must be equal to one. 

That means zero times infinity plus zero times infinity should equal two. Now, by the distributive property, the left side of the equation can be rearranged to zero plus zero times infinity. And since zero plus zero is definitely zero, that reduces down to zero times infinity. Unfortunately, we’ve already defined this as equal to one, while the other side of the equation is still telling us it’s equal to two. So, one equals two. Oddly enough, that's not necessarily wrong; it's just not true in our normal world of numbers. There’s still a way it could be mathematically valid, if one, two, and every other number were equal to zero. But having infinity equal to zero is ultimately not all that useful to mathematicians, or anyone else.

 There actually is something called the Riemann sphere that involves dividing by zero by a different method, but that’s a story for another day. In the meantime, dividing by zero in the most obvious way doesn’t work out so great. But that shouldn’t stop us from living dangerously and experimenting with breaking mathematical rules to see if we can invent fun, new worlds to explore. 

Thank you

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Santizer VS Soap / Which is best for Corona ?

Your hands, up close, are anything but smooth. With peaks and valleys, folds and rifts, there are plenty of hiding places for a virus to stick. If you then touch your face, the virus can infect you. But there are two extraordinarily simple ways you can keep that from happening: soap and water, and hand sanitizer. So which is better?  The coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is one of many viruses whose protective outer surface is made of a lipid bilayer. These lipids are pin shaped molecules whose heads are attracted to water, and tails are repulsed by it. So in water-rich environments, lipids naturally form a shell like this, with the heads outside and the tails inside. Their shared reaction to water makes the lipids stick loosely together— this is called the hydrophobic effect. This outer structure helps the molecular machinery of the virus break through cellular membranes and hijack our cells. But it has thousands upon thousands of weak points where the right molecules could pr...

The incredible history of China's terracotta warriors -

What happens after death? Is there a restful paradise? An eternal torment? A rebirth? Or maybe just nothingness? Well, one Chinese emperor thought that whatever the hereafter was, he better bring an army.  We know that because in 1974, farmers digging a well near their small village stumbled upon one of the most important finds in archeological history: vast underground chambers surrounding that emperor's tomb, and containing more than 8,000life-size clay soldiers ready for battle.  The story of the subterranean army begins with Ying Zheng, who came to power as the king of the Qin state at the age of 13 in 246 BCE. Ambitious and ruthless, he would go on to become Qin Shi Huangdi, the first emperor of China after uniting its seven warring kingdoms. His 36 year reign saw many historic accomplishments, including a universal system of weights and measures, a single standardized writing script for all of China, and a defensive barrier that would later come to be known as the Great ...

Are the illuminati real ?

The year was 1776. In Bavaria, new ideals of rationalism , religious freedom, and universal human rights competed with the Catholic church’s heavy influence over public affairs.  Across the Atlantic, a new nation staked its claim for independence on the basis of these ideas. But back in Bavaria, law professor Adam Weishaupt’s attempts to teach secular philosophy continued to be frustrated. Weishaupt decided to spread his ideas through a secret society that would shine a light on the shortcomings of the Church’s ideology. He called his secret society the Illuminati. Weishaupt modelled aspects of his secret society off a group called the Freemasons. Originally an elite stoneworkers’ guild in the late Middle Ages, the Freemasons had gone from passing down the craft of masonry to more generally promoting ideals of knowledge and reason. Over time, they had grown into a semi-secret, exclusive order that included many wealthy and influential individuals, with elaborate, secret initia...